Peer-Review Process

JPMI Assessment Criteria

1. Background and Objectives
   1. Is the background of the community service clearly described?
   2. Are the objectives of the community service stated clearly and measurably?
   3. Are the objectives of the community service in accordance with the context of the problems faced by the community?
2. Implementation Method
   1. Is the method of implementing community service explained in detail?
   2. Is the implementation method in accordance with the objectives of community service?
   3. Is community involvement in the implementation process explained well?
3. Results and Discussion
   1. Are the results of community service described in detail and clearly?
   2. Is the discussion of the results of community service carried out well?
   3. Is the impact of community service on the problems faced by the community clearly described?
4. Conclusions and Suggestions
   1. Does the conclusion reflect the objectives and results of community service?
   2. Are the suggestions given realistic and can be implemented for further development of community service?
5. Format Suitability and Completeness of References
   1. Does the article follow the format set by the journal?
   2. Are the references used adequate and up-to-date?